Comments on: Simple Semantic Web http://blog.thatsuseful.com/2007/03/15/simple-semantic-web/ Life on and off the Rails Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:47:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: http://segala.com/blog http://blog.thatsuseful.com/2007/03/15/simple-semantic-web/comment-page-1/#comment-469 http://segala.com/blog Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:44 +0000 http://blog.caronsoftware.com/2007/11/25/simple-semantic-web#comment-469 I have a better one - let's get Sarah to wear a content labels t-shirt ;) I have a better one – let’s get Sarah to wear a content labels t-shirt ;)

]]> By: Scott Rutherford http://blog.thatsuseful.com/2007/03/15/simple-semantic-web/comment-page-1/#comment-470 Scott Rutherford Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:44 +0000 http://blog.caronsoftware.com/2007/11/25/simple-semantic-web#comment-470 Works for me!!! Works for me!!!

]]> By: Paddy http://blog.thatsuseful.com/2007/03/15/simple-semantic-web/comment-page-1/#comment-471 Paddy Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:44 +0000 http://blog.caronsoftware.com/2007/11/25/simple-semantic-web#comment-471 Would definitely be useful but there's always going to be people abusing it to generate undue traffic to their page, like misused meta keywords and descriptions before the advent of Google :) If the relevance or value of link labels were supported by page content or other 'content associated labels' or had some other source of verification, then it would be more difficult for people to misuse the new search criteria. ...maybe :) Would definitely be useful but there’s always going to be people abusing it to generate undue traffic to their page, like misused meta keywords and descriptions before the advent of Google :)

If the relevance or value of link labels were supported by page content or other ‘content associated labels’ or had some other source of verification, then it would be more difficult for people to misuse the new search criteria.

…maybe :)

]]>